aykekarallo

17 minutes ago, crashman1980 said:

Hola!

Alguien sabe donde están las texturas de las panties que están en enulll menú "Panties pulled down"?

Me gustaría ver si puedo colocarle alguna textura con hook5 para que las bragas no parezcan de plástico.

Ahí la tienes 

DownPanties001.7z

8 hours ago, crashman1980 said:

Hoy recordé que tenía un sitio web que usaba para mejorar imágenes y olvidé que podía usarlo también para TK17, que tonto fui.

Les doy un ejemplo:

Estaba trabajando con una room con textura 512x512 usando Hook 5. La calidad se veía muy mal, así que probé este sitio web. Es gratis y no tengo nada que ver con el sitio, no es patrocinado ni nada. Lo comparto por que a mi me solucionó el problema de las bajas texturas, originalmente, si estiras una imagen de 512 a 2048, el resultado es el mismo, obvio, solo estás estirándola. Pero con la inteligencia artificial, cuando se agranda, se mejora a la vez.

https://www.upscale.media/es

Aunque puedes usarla para cualquier imagen, lo comparto acá para que puedas mejorar la calidad de las texturas de un modelo, de un room, etc.

No mejores texturas que superarán los 25mb. Yo lo uso para llevar 512 a 2048 y se nota una gran diferencia.

Espero que sepan apreciar esto, por que ayudará muchísimo a mejorar las texturas sin esfuerzo ni conocimiento.

Saludos.

Gracias por el aporte.

Puede venir muy bien sobre todo con texturas del juego original,que son de muy baja calidad normalmente.Es rápido y cómodo.

9 hours ago, sepa said:

Hola buenas.

¿Cómo se puede cambiar el color dela fuente en los menús? Me aparece el fondo en gris claro y la fuente en blanco, por lo que siento como me voy quedando ciego siempre que pongo el juego, y no es por las pajas.

Gracias de antemano

Puedes buscar en este hilo:

https://www.klubexile.com/files/category/71-script-and-interface-addons/

Ahí hay addons para cambiar el interface del juego,fuentes,colores etc

2 hours ago, ddman2 said:

RTGI+H5 video: https://mega.nz/file/QY41HJBC#Bm3kUYzcPFlFPzyZbnC3K2_5NOW3_Ty0GdlwUQDIKa8

This is how to make a comparison of a graphic injector and not what I have done 

2 hours ago, hfg2 said:

Don't know what other reshade filters you are abusing of, but to me the reshade screenshots are actually worse than pure hook5 because it seems you lost a lot of details in postprocessing.

If you want to make a compare then do only a hook5 vs rtgi.

That is a matter of taste.
In this case, the filters give depth to the scene and color temperature (vibrance and some more, not too many). I don't care, I insist,on this case. details are lost.

But yes, it is true that a direct comparison H5 clean vs rtgi would have been more appropriate.

Surely many of you already know this, but lately I have been experimenting with Ray Tracing for Reshade (aka RTGI) developed, for some time, by Pascal Gilcher, occasional Nvidia collaborator and who offers it on Patreon where you can find the latest version (google "RTGI Reshade").

Previous versions have been leaked, I don't know if intentionally, on the net.
To use it, obviously you have to install Reshade (latest version) and download the shader.

Now let´s go with Reshade:

It cannot be said that it is a "pure" Ray Tracing,but it is close enough and works quite well in game.
In the photos above the difference may seem subtle (my settings are moderate).Changes are best appreciated in the details.

In practice the difference is quite obvious. The lighting is more realistic and the characters seem better integrated into the scene thanks to the finer gradient of shadows.

And no, you don't need an RTX graphics card. It should work fine with any relatively modern graphics card, including AMD.
There is a cost in performance, of course. In my case about 10% of fps (GTX) but I suppose that this can vary in each case.

6 hours ago, MarkZappa said:

 This! You really get my motor going with this one, finally I am not the only one who thinks it this way; but somehow our new beloved liberation society that mistooks liberality with debauchery has lead us to this obsesion with tacky exposition til the point erotism has been murdered

I don't know is like everything needs to be simple and overexposed so no one must stop to found its meaning or fantasize with it, everything so cold and seriated that it sucks

One day I stumbled with this photography at a museum, and a friend of mine asked me "Dude, why are you stuck on this picture?" I gently replied, "Look at it, is wonderful, is erotic without even trying it! Is triggering but it seems to not being done for that! It's hot but is just an analogic photography"

Now, let's pretend that spilled glass of milk is the espectator laying on its bed and that blonde's dainty hands still caressing it while she plays with the final product (Like the end of a massage with a very happy a ending); that displacement of meaning and everything was possible without showing tits, through discreet unperceivable sheer fabrics and an average girl (gorgeous but average girl)

Note: All this post does not pretend to hurt nobody, I do love porn, a fucking lot! But sometimes I prefer to see a good wrapped candy and imagine how I unwrap it slowly

Personally, I don't find that particular scene excessively erotic, but this is just a matter of taste. In general, I totally agree with what you mean: an erotic image has to suggest a story in your mind, as crazy as you want, but it has to tell you something to get the viewer's mind going.

I think that is the essence not only of erotic art but of art in general.

13 hours ago, josito said:

Muchas gracias. Si, es verdad que se hace mas pequeño pero, aun así, el manipulador tapa justo la zona del cuerpo que se pretende modificar, dificultando observar el proceso. Supongo que el lo que hay pero tal vez se podría tener en cuenta para próximas actualizaciones. Un saludo.

En realidad sí hay al menos otro modelo de manipulador aparte del que viene por defecto:

Está incluido en el mod VX.KlubExile_GUI (debe de estar publicado en el foro).

Es el que yo uso por que me resulta cómodo,pero no sé si soluciona el problema que comentas.

2 hours ago, crashman1980 said:

El PNG se llama "M_Priest001_Sackcoat"

A propósito, otra pregunta que no tiene que ver con esto último.

Resulta que hay escenarios originales (como el bar), que me gustaría incorporarlos a mi lista. Pero hay problemas que paso a detallar.

He ido a la carpeta del room original que se llama simplemente Classroom (el icon está en otro sitio y se llama room0018, que viene con un .txf). Copié esa carpeta a Activemod, con el PNG room0018 y lo renombré como "icon". Luego le puse un _level_definition dentro y abrí el TK17 sabiendo que no iba a funcionar, pero teniendo un 1% de esperanza.

Hace un tiempo hice algo parecido con algunos escenarios que no tenían _level_definition y algunos funcionaron y otros no.

La gran pregunta.

>>Sabes como podría hacer aparecer escenarios originales adaptados a Hook 5 que obviamente aun no se han agregado, como el salón de clases? Ya me encargaré después de como mejorar esas texturas.

Saludos 

No estoy seguro de si es eso lo que preguntas,pero sólo tienes que copiar la carpeta Room de las texturas que está en Archives,en ActiveMod (con cualquier nombre) y ya debería de aparecerte una nueva en el menu. No cambies los nombres de los archivos que están dentro.

El hook se añade aparte.Cualquier leveldef que pongas debería funcionar.Y tambien las _norm y _spec asociados a las texturas,con su _pass correspondiente.

Por otro lado,ya hay varias retexturas de la "clase" circulando por ahí si buscas un poco.No creo que quede ninguna Room original que nadie haya retexturizado ya.

I don't know if it is the problem that is being talked about here, but when updating to the latest version, the models that used XBody appeared by default with these 3 sliders shifted to the left (which gave them a very strange appearance).

The solution was simple: just bring them back to the middle. The fix is permanent.

22 minutes ago, erikku90 said:

I think you can minimize it, but I don't think you can completely fix it with certain body/face addons. 

Maybe not.But it doesn't appear in this Very Slow cx+Default face..

Just now, Xalas said:

It didn't change the face ass much, mostly the chin area. I will have to tweak it a bit.

I think that as Smoke says it is difficult to solve it that way without seriously altering the face.

It seems to me that it is related to the combination between the mesh of the body and the face mesh.

In this case, for example, BustyDismiss+Default Face:

27 minutes ago, MarkZappa said:

 

 

Alright, my bad!

I'm checking and I think this feature is only for admins and moderators so if any of you need to move or re-arrange loose pictures to any gallery we can see if is possible to implement it globally as a self management option on the future

At the moment I still suggesting to directly upload to a personal or thematic album for better visibility

I suspected that because I didn't see that option anywhere .

I guess the only way is to delete the photos and upload them all to an album.
I think that, as you say, it would be an interesting option to implement in the future.

Thanks anyway.

8 hours ago, demonv1 said:

You can kind of do that now if you click the images tab in your profile. It shows all your posted images.

3 minutes ago, MarkZappa said:

Yeah, is possible!

As demonv1 said above you can manage this from your profile page at the "images" tab where you can move your pics to an album

Just create a new album with a few pictures in the galleries and then go to the profile page images tab and tick the images you want to move, when the button bars appear just click move and in the pop up window tick the "To Album" option

Ok,ok.I´ll give it a try that way.

Thanks!

8 hours ago, MarkZappa said:

If you mean about something like a sort of Instagram feed look alike feature we can check if is possible to implement in the future

In the meanwhile I would advise members to rather opt to create a personal album (Crazy little thing) for better visibility as the main gallery is an ocean of shit posts from trolls that desperately try to fulfill the five post requirement
Nobody, but literally nobody will swim on a septic tank of old Modsgarden stolen pictures when looking for eye candies so...

...my advise... Albums!

Since you're talking about this...
The truth is that I never bothered to create an album because I really upload few photos, but now I would like to have them all in the same place.
As an admin, would it be possible to gather the photos that I already have published in a single album?

If it's possible I really don't know how to do it.

2 hours ago, x17 said:

BTW, do you recall what Pervok exactly mentioned regarding the multithreading ... what was exact issue, exact problem that would occur if this was enabled ? 

Yes.
Several users (including myself) started reporting sudden game crashes around that time. Pervok had no idea at first where the problem was.

In an understated post, @nim604 pointed out that when iMultithreadRenderEnable=true and iUseSeparateShadows=true the game would crash.
I noticed this because the same thing happened to me and so I posted it.
@Siberia immediately called Pevok's attention to this, to which Pervok replied: "Now I know why failures come. Multithread should be developed in a more flexible way."

This is what I remember on the subject.

On 11/28/2022 at 1:00 AM, pes1972 said:

I have some data in hook main.fx that I would love to have explained what they are and what they do for the game and what difference will happen if value changed, does anyone have the knowledge:

iShadowPoolCount                            = 24
iShadowMapSize                               = 4096
iLightPackMode                                 = 0
iPhysXSolverIterations                       = 20

iMultithreadRenderEnable                 = 0
iMaxThreads                                      = 16
iUseSeparateShadows                       = 1
iUseHalfSSAOTargets                         = 0

 

Thankful for info of any of them if someone can explain

 

 

I don't know the meaning of all the parameters but I do know some approximately:

"iMultithreadRenderEnable & iMaxThreads"

It has to do with processor usage I think. It was an improvement that Pervok tried to introduce during development, but it gave serious problems to some users and he ended up removing it from the GUI.
I would leave it as is.

"iUseSeparateShadows"

Allows the hook to separate shadows.

For this to work correctly "force_as_static=true" must be included in all texture pass files in custom rooms (only for static objects,don´t do it for hair,clothes etc)

3 hours ago, sexybastardo said:

If you have more than 3000 poses, reduce the file size of the preview images with the command shell (MAKE BACKUPS OF SAVE/COMMUNITY FOLDER!)

Thanks.

It would be interesting if you could develop this point a bit.

I think I´ve read an Euphie´s post about the respect but I can´t remember the method.

1 minute ago, MURZIK said:

I can just delete it, it is not re-created until I add the tag while already in the game. And the problem is not in its presence, but in its size.

Not my case.

It recreates by itself after I delete it when I relaunch the game.Don´t know for others.

37 minutes ago, MURZIK said:

Now exit the menu (not the game!) and load the room again. Since the problem occurs on the second boot of any room.

Yes. This is true, to the point that after the second or third load from the menu it is better to start the game from scratch because the loading times skyrocket.
But I can't see the relationship between this and the tag system, although I'm not saying there isn't.

I'm more inclined to think that the culprit is the amount of poses being loaded.

With a relatively low amount of poses, say 200 Mb, I can reload the room many times without much problem. I know this for sure because when experimenting with body meshes there is no choice but to reload the game from the menu to see the changes. And this means doing it literally dozens of times.

The subject seemed interesting to me and I did the experiment of loading a given room with and without TagManager.uit (322 Kb).
Loading time for me is virtually the same (like 1 minute 20 sec).

Just saying..

2 hours ago, x17 said:

Unsure, its hard to say exactly ... sometimes its even just luck factor thats decisive - but in many cases, its not, and teams need to "show the balls" on the terrain. What pisses off more is that, even with VAR and all technology, some judges still make atrocious decisions that ruin the whole games.

I personally think that football becomes much more professional in wide sense with time. Many more players from everywhere around the world play in big name football teams, honing their skills in the process, and then contributing a lot to their own national team.

I mean, just check the US team ... I understand that US as country has much much higher popularity of American football and baseball, but theyre now in knockout phase. One Morocco, which played with my national team a draw and passed as first in the group, beating also the crap out of Belgium. And they were supposed to be the "worst" by predictions. Theyre probably the best African team there is at the moment. Asian teams, which are biggest surprises, beating out "best" football teams in the world. Heck, one Japan had around 25 % ball possession in whole match, and they still won. Thats the precision and play with heart.

And Brazil lost today against Cameroon... almost ending second in group. Sure, probably a "B team", but it shows how everyone is fragile.

I dont think many "big" teams are something they were in past. Germany has outclassed Brasil in 2014. ... look at them now, not even passing group stage. One Argentina lost from Saudi Arabia. Belgium went home. One Italy didnt even qualify. All that were before, at one point, "football behemoths". I think the only three teams that have more or less some kind of "lethal continuity" here are Brasil, France and Spain. But even them have their moments of being declassed... it wont be easy walk for them.

I just hope that it wont be, what I said above ... that there will be some massive judge mistake, despite even the VAR. Seems to me this is something that occurs every WC and EURO. Its almost a regular basis, yet FIFA and UEFA are corrupted bodies themselves, so they dont care, they care only about $$$. 

 

Also, this is the last WC in this format ... next one, WC in 2026 in USA, Canada and Mexico, will have 48 teams, expanded from the current 32 teams. I think its good ... even if it will "dilute" it a bit, it will give chances to many more to be in world cup. But yeah ... you can see whats the TRUE reason of this expansion ... again $$$. LOL.

I just finished watching (repeated) something from Brazil-Cameroon. Cameroon played fantastic football and they were very brave, it's a pity they were eliminated.

I think it seems clear that the US will be part of the world football scene in the near future, which is great, they will bring new things.You have to congratulate them.

FIFA is also very interested in this ($). We have always known what their priority was,but in this World Cup their cynicism exceeds all limits..

5 hours ago, x17 said:

South Korea rekt Portugal ... both Asian teams (Japan and South Korea) have shown not only amazing skills, but also true football play with heart. Some of best gameplays in whole tournament, and it shows. And now both Japan and S.Korea have advanced to knockout stage ... absolutely 200 % well deserved.

Thats the "football by heart"... havent seen it in this scale since 90s and early 2000s. South Korea will probably go on Brazil now (there is a very very slim chance for Brazil not to be first in group), but with this play... who knows what can happen, even bigger sensations.

Maybe they should organize again World Cup in S.Korea and Japan like it was in 2002. ... shows how Asian teams have become VERY dangerous even to largest opponents. 

In general, I agree with what you say. But it also leads me to another thought: I've been watching all my life, initially small teams "killing giants".

It's not that difficult. A well-disciplined and psyched-up team just has to park the bus in front of the goal and wait for luck in a counterattack. Once they succeed, they go back to hang from the crossbar and wait for time to pass. So you can win anyone.
Teams like Spain, Germany or Brazil cannot play that because in their country they would be crucified.

Another thing is after the round of 16. You can't play that anymore. You have to go out and play football and win or you're out.

If you look at history, in the final phase of the competition they are always more or less the same teams (yes, someone else sneaks in from time to time) but they are always teams that are going to look for the tournament. Anything else is a failure for they.

That's why I don't think teams like Japan, Morocco and other indeed good teams will reach the final stage. But I hope I'm wrong and another era begins. It would be refreshing.

2 hours ago, Morius said:

Ah sí, esa solución es mucho mejor que la mía si sabes cómo modificar el archivo. Como dijo SovietTiger, el mío puede crear otro efecto indeseable, según el caso.

Lo del "clamp range" también es buena idea,desde luego.Pero sucede que al modificarlo puedes alterar la iluminación general en estos casos,lo que puede convenir o no.

Me he encontrado a menudo con esta molestia.Sería interesante encontrarle solución,si la hubiera.